Filter by
Evaluations (15)
RSSFinal evaluation of “Cooperation on Competition in Asia” (PI/2017/383-969) finds the action highly relevant and coherent, with good effectiveness and EU added value. Main gaps: delayed reporting, limited outreach, and weak gender/environment mainstreaming.
- Project locations
- China, India, Japan, South Korea
- Programme
- Common Foreign & Security Policy actions
The evaluation of dialogue and peace programming in Afghanistan reviews APSM I (2019–2020), APSM II (2020–2022) and AIDI (2022–2024). It finds high relevance and coherence, strong early effectiveness, and adaptive shifts after Aug 2021, impact is indirect, sustaining civil society and dialogue.
- Project locations
- Afghanistan
- Programme
- Common Foreign & Security Policy actions
Final evaluation of EUPOP Indonesia finds the action broadly relevant and effective in widening EU outreach (436 events, 279,596 participants, 21.6m reach). Main weaknesses: event-led rather than strategic comms, heavy reliance on paid views, and weak M&E/reporting (OC12: 52%).
- Project locations
- Indonesia
- Programme
- Common Foreign & Security Policy actions
Final evaluation of LCBA Americas (2020–2024) finds the programme broadly well designed and relevant to EU economic diplomacy, with satisfactory results despite early market-pull and coordination gaps, LATAM and Mexico exceeded key commercialisation targets.
- Project locations
- Brazil, Colombia, Argentina, Chile, Mexico, Canada
- Programme
- Common Foreign & Security Policy actions
This report assesses the “Early Warning and Rapid Response” action in Ecuador’s northern border, examining relevance, coherence, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability and EU added value.
- Project locations
- Ecuador
- Programme
- Common Foreign & Security Policy actions