Evaluations

Final evaluation of “Cooperation on Competition in Asia” (PI/2017/383-969) finds the action highly relevant and coherent, with good effectiveness and EU added value. Main gaps: delayed reporting, limited outreach, and weak gender/environment mainstreaming.

This final evaluation report examines two social cohesion projects between internally displaced persons (IDPs), refugees and host communities in Burkina Faso and Niger, funded by the EU and implemented by WFP under the Humanitarian-Development-Peace.

The evaluation of dialogue and peace programming in Afghanistan reviews APSM I (2019–2020), APSM II (2020–2022) and AIDI (2022–2024). It finds high relevance and coherence, strong early effectiveness, and adaptive shifts after Aug 2021, impact is indirect, sustaining civil society and dialogue.

Final evaluation of EUPOP Indonesia finds the action broadly relevant and effective in widening EU outreach (436 events, 279,596 participants, 21.6m reach). Main weaknesses: event-led rather than strategic comms, heavy reliance on paid views, and weak M&E/reporting (OC12: 52%).

Final evaluation of LCBA Americas (2020–2024) finds the programme broadly well designed and relevant to EU economic diplomacy, with satisfactory results despite early market-pull and coordination gaps, LATAM and Mexico exceeded key commercialisation targets.

This report assesses the “Early Warning and Rapid Response” action in Ecuador’s northern border, examining relevance, coherence, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability and EU added value.